![]() |
|
_IIF limits two questions - Printable Version +- QB64 Phoenix Edition (https://qb64phoenix.com/forum) +-- Forum: Chatting and Socializing (https://qb64phoenix.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=11) +--- Forum: General Discussion (https://qb64phoenix.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: _IIF limits two questions (/showthread.php?tid=3309) Pages:
1
2
|
_IIF limits two questions - doppler - 12-20-2024 1. Is the new _IIF limited to only numerics ? Or can I play with strings too ? 2. Can this statement be on one line: p=_iff(p=instr(thing$,"\"): p <= 10, p, p=0) re: position of "\" must be less than 11 else make it zero Question two in my mind very iffy. If question #1 is true. Don't need an code answer for question 2. I could do that in my sleep. Just thought sub-coding might be possible in a coded line. RE: _IIF limits two questions - Petr - 12-20-2024 Hi, In the last two parameters of the function you set its output values. The first for true, the second for false. Code: (Select All)
RE: _IIF limits two questions - bplus - 12-20-2024 (12-20-2024, 07:06 PM)doppler Wrote: 2. Can this statement be on one line: p=_iff(p=instr(thing$,"\"): p <= 10, p, p=0) How about: p=_iff(instr(thing$,"\") <= 10, instr(thing$,"\"), 0) RE: _IIF limits two questions - Pete - 12-20-2024 If iff works with strings why didn't they just name it _stiff? Pete - We missed _hitkey by that much! RE: _IIF limits two questions - Pete - 12-21-2024 Petr's example as a string I think would be... Code: (Select All)
I say think because I haven't downloaded and installed the new version yet. Someone please correct Steve if I am wrong. Pete RE: _IIF limits two questions - doppler - 12-21-2024 (12-20-2024, 09:07 PM)bplus Wrote:Yes that is the basis of the line. My real question, can I mini sub-code the first parameter of the IFF (test comparison). I thought I could be fancy on the first statement. Since the IFF statements are separated by comma's. Only the last minicoding result is the real test. ie: (p<=10). I only happened to use instr as a question example. The minicoding could be almost anything and referencing other variables to manipulate. Hell for all intended purposes the first statement could be a sub-function call out. ie:(12-20-2024, 07:06 PM)doppler Wrote: 2. Can this statement be on one line: p=_iff(p=instr(thing$,"\"): p <= 10, p, p=0) dim share x, p p=_iff(test,p,p=0) sub test x=instr(thing$,"\") if x<=10 the p=x end sub The whole idea of a sub maybe washed up RE: _IIF limits two questions - bplus - 12-21-2024 ![]() How about: p = instr(thing$,"\") p = _iff(p<11, p, 0) _IFF is just a very brief assignment statement made from a decision. RE: _IIF limits two questions - madscijr - 12-22-2024 (12-21-2024, 12:02 AM)Pete Wrote: Petr's example as a string I think would be...I haven't used the new _IIF command yet, but in VBA (and VB6 if I recall?) you could use IIF to return multiple types. In QB64 / QB64PE, I had to make seperate functions for different return types, like below, but it would be nice if the built-in _IIF command just worked with whatever type you passed in for parameters 2 & 3 (as long as parameters 2 & 3 aren't 2 different types)... Code: (Select All) 'IntegerRE: _IIF limits two questions - a740g - 12-23-2024 Quote:but it would be nice if the built-in _IIF command just worked with whatever type you passed in for parameters 2 & 3 (as long as parameters 2 & 3 aren't 2 different types)...It does. RE: _IIF limits two questions - madscijr - 12-23-2024 (12-23-2024, 01:15 AM)a740g Wrote:That's a really cool improvement, thanks guys!Quote:but it would be nice if the built-in _IIF command just worked with whatever type you passed in for parameters 2 & 3 (as long as parameters 2 & 3 aren't 2 different types)...It does. Along those lines, I don't suppose it would be possible (or universally appreciated) to support operator overloading in functions? ie you can define a function x that receives certain parameter types, and define one or more additional functions also called x but receiving different parameters, where the compiler will know which definition to use based on the parameter types sent? In other words, it would allow someone to define a function that works with different parameter types like _iif does. |