03-30-2025, 11:29 AM
Back in the early days ram was expensive, storage space much more so and CPU power the race was on. Nowadays ungodly amount of ram is cheap, couple of buck per terabyte storage space and CPU's are now limited by Moore's law, must expand width wise (cores). Why the history lesson ?
Operating systems are still written not caring about any of that stuff. It's give me more, more, more. Today I can identify how much ram is available, how much storage space there is and all kinds of info about the CPU. So what is there to think about ???
So how can you tell what the storage medium is ? Is it networked, HDD, SSD, Ramdrive and dare I say cough, cough Floppy ? I have all kinds of programs written to create scripts running in dos CMD terminals. Performance wise I go nuts with multiple task terminals when I know it's executing inside a Ramdrive. Because I know it will be limited by the CPU quality performance and a small factor ram speed. If I can tell the media type, I won't go nuts on something other than a Ramdrive. Just thinking about 12 terminals executing on a floppy, give me shivers.
Your thoughts or solution ?
Operating systems are still written not caring about any of that stuff. It's give me more, more, more. Today I can identify how much ram is available, how much storage space there is and all kinds of info about the CPU. So what is there to think about ???
So how can you tell what the storage medium is ? Is it networked, HDD, SSD, Ramdrive and dare I say cough, cough Floppy ? I have all kinds of programs written to create scripts running in dos CMD terminals. Performance wise I go nuts with multiple task terminals when I know it's executing inside a Ramdrive. Because I know it will be limited by the CPU quality performance and a small factor ram speed. If I can tell the media type, I won't go nuts on something other than a Ramdrive. Just thinking about 12 terminals executing on a floppy, give me shivers.
Your thoughts or solution ?