Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DAY 040: _TOGGLEBIT
#6
(12-19-2022, 08:43 PM)SMcNeill Wrote: What're you talking about??  There's no problem with using a BIT as a return value for a Function.

But I come from v0.98. Because I don't do as much programming as you, I say something and then you appear to tell me it's wrong. (crying)

Fiddlesticks. "_TOGGLEBIT" is still better toward a single LONG or _INTEGER64 and descriptive constants for which bit, and variable "AS _BIT" for me has died. Have to waste an entire byte anyway only to have a bit for anything.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
DAY 040: _TOGGLEBIT - by Pete - 12-19-2022, 07:43 PM
RE: DAY 040: _TOGGLEBIT - by mnrvovrfc - 12-19-2022, 08:32 PM
RE: DAY 040: _TOGGLEBIT - by SMcNeill - 12-19-2022, 08:43 PM
RE: DAY 040: _TOGGLEBIT - by mnrvovrfc - 12-19-2022, 09:37 PM
RE: DAY 040: _TOGGLEBIT - by SMcNeill - 12-19-2022, 09:05 PM
RE: DAY 040: _TOGGLEBIT - by Pete - 12-19-2022, 09:17 PM
RE: DAY 040: _TOGGLEBIT - by SMcNeill - 12-19-2022, 09:47 PM
RE: DAY 040: _TOGGLEBIT - by Pete - 12-19-2022, 10:03 PM
RE: DAY 040: _TOGGLEBIT - by SMcNeill - 12-19-2022, 10:22 PM
RE: DAY 040: _TOGGLEBIT - by Pete - 12-19-2022, 10:30 PM
RE: DAY 040: _TOGGLEBIT - by SMcNeill - 12-19-2022, 10:42 PM
RE: DAY 040: _TOGGLEBIT - by bplus - 12-19-2022, 11:20 PM
RE: DAY 040: _TOGGLEBIT - by Pete - 12-19-2022, 11:22 PM
RE: DAY 040: _TOGGLEBIT - by Jack - 12-19-2022, 11:58 PM
RE: DAY 040: _TOGGLEBIT - by Pete - 12-20-2022, 01:11 AM
RE: DAY 040: _TOGGLEBIT - by vince - 12-20-2022, 01:59 AM
RE: DAY 040: _TOGGLEBIT - by OldMoses - 12-20-2022, 03:46 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)