I should be the one complaining. But I don't. Because I'm making another post which is off-topic here.
While QB64 was up to Galleon to improve, it must have started with allowing a subprogram written by an user to omit a parameter "in the middle" or at the end. Something that required an "IsMissing()" that I discovered in OpenOffice.org BASIC, or which required that "va_list" junk from C library. I'm going with what I read somewhere in the Wiki in the past.
What I said about the hash tables was something I discovered in the BASIC portion of the QB64 source code. But that's ready and waiting to be used for whoever could sort out that mess.
While QB64 was up to Galleon to improve, it must have started with allowing a subprogram written by an user to omit a parameter "in the middle" or at the end. Something that required an "IsMissing()" that I discovered in OpenOffice.org BASIC, or which required that "va_list" junk from C library. I'm going with what I read somewhere in the Wiki in the past.
What I said about the hash tables was something I discovered in the BASIC portion of the QB64 source code. But that's ready and waiting to be used for whoever could sort out that mess.