https://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue...508#fedora
This but sucks so very hard.
It looks like IBM and Red Hat want as less people as possible programming, especially if the user is stuck using one operating system which belongs to Fedora/Red Hat Enterprise Linux family. They are not leaving behind the GNU Compiler Collection because they want to save disk space on the ISO!
They didn't dare touch Git (yet). :/
Kudos to Slackware, soon to celebrate its 30th anniversary for never, ever taking off many of the "devel" libraries and other tools needed to build PPA's and stuff like that. Because that was a requirement on Unix. Long live the slack!
I was going to post this on the QB64PE v3.7 release announcement thread but created a separate topic here because I would like other people to react to these news about one of the most popular distros around. React only to the review about Fedora 38 if you want. Correct me if this insinuation about "gcc" is not right LOL.
This but sucks so very hard.
It looks like IBM and Red Hat want as less people as possible programming, especially if the user is stuck using one operating system which belongs to Fedora/Red Hat Enterprise Linux family. They are not leaving behind the GNU Compiler Collection because they want to save disk space on the ISO!
They didn't dare touch Git (yet). :/
Kudos to Slackware, soon to celebrate its 30th anniversary for never, ever taking off many of the "devel" libraries and other tools needed to build PPA's and stuff like that. Because that was a requirement on Unix. Long live the slack!
I was going to post this on the QB64PE v3.7 release announcement thread but created a separate topic here because I would like other people to react to these news about one of the most popular distros around. React only to the review about Fedora 38 if you want. Correct me if this insinuation about "gcc" is not right LOL.