QB64 Phoenix Edition › Chatting and Socializing › General Discussion v
DIM AT -- feature request

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Linear Mode
DIM AT -- feature request
mnrvovrfc Away
Posting Freak
*****
Posts: 1,356
Threads: 58
Joined: Jul 2022
Reputation: 53
#2
08-14-2023, 04:28 PM
The "DIM" statement presented there looks confusing.

Therefore after many years I'm glad QB64 instead has _MEM and _OFFSET.

I understand, use "m(1), m(2)" etc. to access portions in "buff", but yet this could be simplified with _MEMGET and _MEMPUT wrapped into convenience functions. Because we are all using 64-bit there would be no performance penalty for it.
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
DIM AT -- feature request - by Jack - 08-14-2023, 03:49 PM
RE: DIM AT -- feature request - by mnrvovrfc - 08-14-2023, 04:28 PM
RE: DIM AT -- feature request - by grymmjack - 08-15-2023, 12:15 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Preserving multi-dim arrays Pete 5 416 12-19-2025, 03:17 PM
Last Post: Dimster
  Feature Request: Limit Scope of a "Find" and "Change" hanness 5 723 06-21-2025, 11:21 PM
Last Post: SMcNeill
Tongue request: anyone want to do a remake of goat simulator or desert bus? madscijr 7 1,581 10-01-2024, 04:30 PM
Last Post: SMcNeill
Question REDIM takes more resources than DIM? bplus 34 5,963 07-23-2024, 01:04 PM
Last Post: luke
  Feature Request - SOUND breaks on/off Abazek 6 1,510 02-05-2024, 10:59 PM
Last Post: TerryRitchie

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)