Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DIM AT -- feature request
#2
The "DIM" statement presented there looks confusing.

Therefore after many years I'm glad QB64 instead has _MEM and _OFFSET.

I understand, use "m(1), m(2)" etc. to access portions in "buff", but yet this could be simplified with _MEMGET and _MEMPUT wrapped into convenience functions. Because we are all using 64-bit there would be no performance penalty for it.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
DIM AT -- feature request - by Jack - 08-14-2023, 03:49 PM
RE: DIM AT -- feature request - by mnrvovrfc - 08-14-2023, 04:28 PM
RE: DIM AT -- feature request - by grymmjack - 08-15-2023, 12:15 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)