(10-19-2023, 07:17 PM)SpriggsySpriggs Wrote: Have there been any thoughts on making a "WITH" keyword for QB64 for assigning values to UDT members?
I would not be opposed to WITH, if and only if, the QB64PE IDE included a command to auto-fill in the explicit variable name in a selected code block. Because I personally don't like reading through code inside a WITH - it's easier for my brain to visualize what's happening by seeing the actual variable name.
I like Steve's alias suggestion, as long as we don't go crazy with it, and start adding all kinds of complicated things (aliased types, etc.)
Just my own personal preference!