12-30-2023, 05:13 PM
And here: https://qb64phoenix.com/forum/showthread...262&page=6
I am slowly losing perspective. What is now correct:
1. QB45 delivers an incorrect result, and since QB64 wants to be 100% compatible with QB45, this error should now be implemented in QB64.
2. QB45 gives the correct result, QB64 the wrong one.
If 1.: Why should implement false output in QB64 now? Is that not an overkill only for the compatibility?
I am slowly losing perspective. What is now correct:
1. QB45 delivers an incorrect result, and since QB64 wants to be 100% compatible with QB45, this error should now be implemented in QB64.
2. QB45 gives the correct result, QB64 the wrong one.
If 1.: Why should implement false output in QB64 now? Is that not an overkill only for the compatibility?