Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
REDIM takes more resources than DIM?
#2
It's functionally the same, where is that quote from?

They might be talking about using `REDIM` to resize existing arrays, in which case yes it is kinda expensive for larger arrays, mostly if you use `_PRESERVE`. If you're just replacing all your DIM statements with REDIM though then that wouldn't apply since you wouldn't have any resizes happening after the array is first declared.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
REDIM takes more resources than DIM? - by bplus - 07-17-2024, 12:21 AM
RE: REDIM takes more resources than DIM? - by DSMan195276 - 07-17-2024, 12:54 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Preserving multi-dim arrays Pete 5 432 12-19-2025, 03:17 PM
Last Post: Dimster
  packaging resources tool TempodiBasic 6 600 09-22-2025, 11:16 PM
Last Post: TempodiBasic
  DIM AT -- feature request Jack 2 739 08-15-2023, 12:15 AM
Last Post: grymmjack
  REDIM, TYPE, and STRING Woes TerryRitchie 16 3,205 04-13-2023, 05:17 AM
Last Post: DSMan195276
  suggestion: initialize array values within the DIM statement bobalooie 19 3,407 12-22-2022, 06:46 PM
Last Post: Kernelpanic

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)