Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
REDIM takes more resources than DIM?
#34
Both Rob and Fell were big on supporting QuickBASIC legacy. I think the VAL() bug, that we could use to distinguish between different versions of QB, was an exception to that, because it was just something that needed fixing. This is more a feature than a bug, so my guess is it will be maintained as-is.

Probably the biggest missing link is no one ever tackled support for FN. I imagine converting to C would be an FN pain. If I ever wanted the few programs I made using FN to work again, I'd just have to change the FN statements to real functions. FN was a fun little shortcut to have, but I've been able to live happily without it, especially since the time went into creating so many new highly usable features. Still, it's really a credit to the early developers that they didn't get lost in new features at the expense of legacy, that so many other BASIC products of that time experienced.

Pete
Shoot first and shoot people who ask questions, later.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
REDIM takes more resources than DIM? - by bplus - 07-17-2024, 12:21 AM
RE: REDIM takes more resources than DIM? - by Pete - 07-22-2024, 10:35 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Preserving multi-dim arrays Pete 5 416 12-19-2025, 03:17 PM
Last Post: Dimster
  packaging resources tool TempodiBasic 6 580 09-22-2025, 11:16 PM
Last Post: TempodiBasic
  DIM AT -- feature request Jack 2 711 08-15-2023, 12:15 AM
Last Post: grymmjack
  REDIM, TYPE, and STRING Woes TerryRitchie 16 3,146 04-13-2023, 05:17 AM
Last Post: DSMan195276
  suggestion: initialize array values within the DIM statement bobalooie 19 3,355 12-22-2022, 06:46 PM
Last Post: Kernelpanic

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)