Thank you Steve! I took your example and played around with it a LOT and discovered that the _Delay .25 fixes a lot of things...but why ???
I'm not wanting to stretch a screen and keep the aspect ratios the same - I'm wanting to create a new screen where the user could stretch the screen as needed (and keep the same aspect ratio). The menu screen is not changeable, but after making their selection the main screen would be stretchable. When you go to the main screen and add Stretch to it, as you mentioned in your first post, the width stayed the same (physical onscreen size). When you do not add stretch it changes on screen correctly. There is something happening when Stretch is added.
Sometimes when entering a new screen mode without the delay, the text becomes a blurred larger version, but introducing the delay also fixed that. So far all of these issues seem to only manifest themselves when either smooth or stretch are used. This is a very interesting issue that makes me wonder if this is a bug? It also makes me wonder if someone is running on a old and very slow PC that the delay will have to be longer to avoid this issue?
I am thoroughly confused at this point, but the delay seems to be a work around...but inquiring minds still want to know - why ?
I'm not wanting to stretch a screen and keep the aspect ratios the same - I'm wanting to create a new screen where the user could stretch the screen as needed (and keep the same aspect ratio). The menu screen is not changeable, but after making their selection the main screen would be stretchable. When you go to the main screen and add Stretch to it, as you mentioned in your first post, the width stayed the same (physical onscreen size). When you do not add stretch it changes on screen correctly. There is something happening when Stretch is added.
Sometimes when entering a new screen mode without the delay, the text becomes a blurred larger version, but introducing the delay also fixed that. So far all of these issues seem to only manifest themselves when either smooth or stretch are used. This is a very interesting issue that makes me wonder if this is a bug? It also makes me wonder if someone is running on a old and very slow PC that the delay will have to be longer to avoid this issue?
I am thoroughly confused at this point, but the delay seems to be a work around...but inquiring minds still want to know - why ?