10-23-2024, 02:27 PM
When it comes to a Logical approach for code to solve a problem it's uncanny how the use of a "Logical Operator" .. IMP... becomes so redundant as you have demonstrated TDarcos.
Do you feel however that there is a subtle difference between IMPLYING someone's age from a given statement v's a concrete IF/Else choice of two outcomes?
Tempodibasic replies here have introduced Popper's Falisification Theory. I'm looking at it as that which appears to the left side of an IMP statement.
Popper would Falsify the left side of IMP if there is a logical chance that the unlaying theory/math of the left side might be false. But the only way to find out if the left side is False would be to act like it is True until your program hits a scenario where the Left side is indeed False. This is the point where your program actually becomes better or more advanced (also according to Popper). This implies (IMP) you really only learn by your mistakes. Especially believing a Boy has 3 knees.
Thanks for the discussion (again).
Do you feel however that there is a subtle difference between IMPLYING someone's age from a given statement v's a concrete IF/Else choice of two outcomes?
Tempodibasic replies here have introduced Popper's Falisification Theory. I'm looking at it as that which appears to the left side of an IMP statement.
Popper would Falsify the left side of IMP if there is a logical chance that the unlaying theory/math of the left side might be false. But the only way to find out if the left side is False would be to act like it is True until your program hits a scenario where the Left side is indeed False. This is the point where your program actually becomes better or more advanced (also according to Popper). This implies (IMP) you really only learn by your mistakes. Especially believing a Boy has 3 knees.
Thanks for the discussion (again).