12-13-2024, 07:46 PM
Hi guys. @SpriggsySpriggs just a short answer from me personally, why for example you didn't get an answer from me about your programs. I speak for myself and no one else. It is absolutely obvious, it is completely clear that you are several dozen levels higher in programming than me. If we leave aside the language barrier, which is a major obstacle for me, then I would like to ask: How many tens or hundreds of hours of time have you spent studying dynamic libraries? I assume it was many tens of hours. Then of course don't be surprised that I don't ask you anything. Why? Simply because I don't know what other possibilities I could expect using dynamic libraries. What I wanted to ask you in the future is the possibility of streaming sound on the Internet, the possibility of saving a stream from the Internet to a file, the possibility of capturing sound with a microphone. How about listening to some streaming Internet radio. That could also be done using dynamic libraries. For me, you are the god of dynamic libraries. I don't want an answer to any of that. I'll try it myself first. I'll have to fail a few times before I turn to you. But I haven't even started yet because I have so many other things of my own to do.
@BowlMan84 I apologize for my harshness. I understand, perhaps more than you think, how proud you are of your finished programs, I understand that you want to hide your methods and procedures that you use in your programs and that cost you a lot of time and effort from others. That's normal. It also pisses me off when someone releases only a slightly modified part of my program in their version and doesn't mention the original author. I don't recognize these people because they don't have an honest character. On the other hand - what should developers say who develop a program that is hidden behind some command? The minimum decency is to mention the language behind the finished program. That's what you did. So keep your head up. I'm glad that you program in the same language as me. Your code is yours. It's your time and your work. If, as you wrote, you want to program professionally in the future, I'm a little sad. To achieve this, you need to use the basics you gained with QB64 to move on to a language that is in demand on the market. Python, Java, C++, Visual C++ or another. That's my opinion.I Personally take it as a hobby and have no ambitions to make a living from it professionally in the future.
@BowlMan84 I apologize for my harshness. I understand, perhaps more than you think, how proud you are of your finished programs, I understand that you want to hide your methods and procedures that you use in your programs and that cost you a lot of time and effort from others. That's normal. It also pisses me off when someone releases only a slightly modified part of my program in their version and doesn't mention the original author. I don't recognize these people because they don't have an honest character. On the other hand - what should developers say who develop a program that is hidden behind some command? The minimum decency is to mention the language behind the finished program. That's what you did. So keep your head up. I'm glad that you program in the same language as me. Your code is yours. It's your time and your work. If, as you wrote, you want to program professionally in the future, I'm a little sad. To achieve this, you need to use the basics you gained with QB64 to move on to a language that is in demand on the market. Python, Java, C++, Visual C++ or another. That's my opinion.I Personally take it as a hobby and have no ambitions to make a living from it professionally in the future.