01-11-2025, 06:30 PM
Yes! use Option _Explicit to setup QB64 code to port to QBJS absolutely good idea!
You can comment it out after setup everything in QB64. Maybe, probably, QBJS just ignores Option _Explicit if you don't comment it out, now. Honestly its been awhile since I've practiced porting to QBJS.
I know dbox is working on big update soon.
Also reading over some notes of other problems I had:
use integers only for array indexes
use integers for pset and other graphics x, y
don't step 0 anything in Lines, ie a QB64 Circle Fill Routine using lines to fill a circle
QBJS has a circle fill built in I have code somewhere for that fix if anyone wants it.
You can comment it out after setup everything in QB64. Maybe, probably, QBJS just ignores Option _Explicit if you don't comment it out, now. Honestly its been awhile since I've practiced porting to QBJS.
I know dbox is working on big update soon.
Also reading over some notes of other problems I had:
use integers only for array indexes
use integers for pset and other graphics x, y
don't step 0 anything in Lines, ie a QB64 Circle Fill Routine using lines to fill a circle
QBJS has a circle fill built in I have code somewhere for that fix if anyone wants it.
724 855 599 923 575 468 400 206 147 564 878 823 652 556 bxor cross forever