Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Comparison QB64 compiled with gcc optimizations and without
#48
personally, i decided to compile qb64 with option O3 because the editor is faster under linux but i agree with DSMan195276, the compilation of programs is slower with this option. that said it depends on the power and memory available in your computer. if not if you have a light program, it could be ok. otherwise it's better to use the original version of qb64 and when the program is finished. consider compiling it with option O3...
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Comparison QB64 compiled with Ofast and without - by Coolman - 06-14-2022, 08:50 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  niXman gcc-13.1.0 Jack 8 1,851 10-04-2023, 12:51 PM
Last Post: a740g
  BASIC's Comparison Matrix: ideas for content? CharlieJV 28 6,723 10-03-2022, 01:27 AM
Last Post: CharlieJV
  String comparison oddity...[SOLVED] Pete 6 1,292 08-05-2022, 07:16 PM
Last Post: Pete
  Found a BUG with the QB64 editor compiled with the -O3 option Coolman 2 826 06-02-2022, 06:27 PM
Last Post: Coolman

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)