Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Standardised extended libs???
#4
Hey Gang!

Well, I may not post much but I sure do code! I have MY own set of tools as I am sure most of you do but even though I am a HUGE advocate for learning how something works, one should not always need to learn/interpret every last detail to use it.

The most basic would be things like input handlers, generic definitions and the like...i.e Vectors....in making GDK2 compatible with fzxNGN (Still working on it!) I had to re build from the ground up as GDK's vectors were different, but this has had GREAT results....so im okay with it but IF we BOTH had used a pre built, community agreed upon framework then they would simply be compatible with each other from the get go, or in an idea world, just parts of the same library, rather than the required wrappers, conversions, etc...also this would allow for EASY documentation, tutorials and provide a WHOLE series of other benefits.

I'll be posting something Ive been working on which use MY default stuff...then you may get a better idea.

Unseen
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Standardised extended libs??? - by Unseen Machine - 03-05-2025, 05:01 AM
RE: Standardised extended libs??? - by Petr - 03-05-2025, 06:27 PM
RE: Standardised extended libs??? - by Unseen Machine - 03-21-2025, 01:22 AM
RE: Standardised extended libs??? - by SMcNeill - 03-21-2025, 08:16 PM
RE: Standardised extended libs??? - by mdijkens - 03-22-2025, 01:51 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)