Yesterday, 11:49 PM
Right usable with _integer64 and one more, 19, with _unsigned _integer64.
I think we both approached this by stripping out signs, decimal, etc.
Well, I'm stumped why I topped out my approach at 8, since signs were not an issue for me either, I could have used 9.
I would probably look into Jack's method if I ever go back to expanding on the project. Things like higher order roots really started to slow down my string calc routine. It would do them, but not as fast as online versions for those types of calculation.
Pete
I think we both approached this by stripping out signs, decimal, etc.
Well, I'm stumped why I topped out my approach at 8, since signs were not an issue for me either, I could have used 9.
I would probably look into Jack's method if I ever go back to expanding on the project. Things like higher order roots really started to slow down my string calc routine. It would do them, but not as fast as online versions for those types of calculation.
Pete