Pete, there's a place for an eval type math evaluater but I prefer to call each function individually
for me it's easier to see the program flow that way and it may perform better, besides, trying to figure out the workings of someone else all-in-one math evaluator can be incredibly hard, what if there's a bug but can't figure out this conglomerate of functions ?
for me it's easier to see the program flow that way and it may perform better, besides, trying to figure out the workings of someone else all-in-one math evaluator can be incredibly hard, what if there's a bug but can't figure out this conglomerate of functions ?