Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! [Resolved]
#21
(10-14-2022, 08:51 PM)Pete Wrote: @TerryRitchie

I know, right? I think this one still has the devs a bit mystified. I had Steve mesmerized for days the time I pulled a rabbit out of my hat. He said it caught him off guard, because he was so used to me pulling ideas out of my other end. Ah, misdirection, my favorite tool in my SCREEN ZERO magic kit!

Pete

I knews it twasn't so, ya varmit!  Function calls always have overhead attached to them, so you'll always be faster to go with a variable when you can like this.  My code above proved to ya that 3 SCREEN calls weren't as fast as 1 SCREEN call and then 3 variable calls.  I just hadn't dug through the code enough to search out where your actual roadblock was at -- though it seems Matt has did that for us already, Mr. Reused-H!!  ;D
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by SMcNeill - 10-14-2022, 10:01 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Faster addition in string math. Now with multiplication! Pete 23 4,034 08-22-2022, 02:26 AM
Last Post: Pete

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)