You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! [Resolved]

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Linear Mode

You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! [Resolved]

Pete Offline

Offline

Ad-mini-strator

Posts: 2,541
Threads: 255
Joined: Apr 2022
Reputation: 132

#29

10-15-2022, 06:16 PM

You did the tag properly. It's Case sensitive, and you got that right, too. What browser are you using? I have an older FireFox and every time I use @ message, and this is a PITA, I have to do this:

1) Save it

2) Click on Quick Edit, and save changes

Then to see that it got hyperlinked, I have to refresh the page!

I'm wondering if other browsers or more current ones don't have this problem on this board.

Pete

Find

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! [Resolved] - by Pete - 10-13-2022, 09:34 PM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by Kernelpanic - 10-13-2022, 11:41 PM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by Pete - 10-14-2022, 02:20 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by mnrvovrfc - 10-14-2022, 12:21 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by JRace - 10-14-2022, 02:43 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by Pete - 10-14-2022, 03:06 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by SMcNeill - 10-14-2022, 04:33 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by DSMan195276 - 10-14-2022, 04:41 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by Pete - 10-14-2022, 05:22 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by DSMan195276 - 10-14-2022, 06:39 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by Pete - 10-14-2022, 05:50 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by SMcNeill - 10-14-2022, 07:57 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by SpriggsySpriggs - 10-14-2022, 01:53 PM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by Pete - 10-14-2022, 05:55 PM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by SMcNeill - 10-14-2022, 07:15 PM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by DSMan195276 - 10-14-2022, 09:34 PM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by Pete - 10-14-2022, 07:25 PM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by TerryRitchie - 10-14-2022, 08:33 PM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by Pete - 10-14-2022, 08:51 PM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by SMcNeill - 10-14-2022, 10:01 PM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by Pete - 10-14-2022, 09:49 PM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by TerryRitchie - 10-15-2022, 03:38 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! [Resolved] - by Pete - 10-14-2022, 10:44 PM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! [Resolved] - by Pete - 10-15-2022, 04:11 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! [Resolved] - by TerryRitchie - 10-15-2022, 05:01 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! [Resolved] - by Pete - 10-15-2022, 05:12 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! [Resolved] - by TerryRitchie - 10-15-2022, 05:28 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! [Resolved] - by TerryRitchie - 10-15-2022, 05:52 PM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! [Resolved] - by Pete - 10-15-2022, 06:16 PM

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)