Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Child IDEs locking the parent....
#1
So when i get a "blah blah error caused by in..." and i open the library by clicking its include, I cant edit my main code again until i close the child window...

WHY? 

Can it be changed? Made as an option to allow changes? Otherwise, i make my mod in my lib, close the window, my main code still reports an error I press space or something to make it reparse) and i then have to reopen the lib...mod, close, check, etc...

John
Reply
#2
That feature is to reparse the include files after the Child IDE's work is done
Similar to change a character to update the IDE Syntax...
Reply
#3
(11-05-2025, 03:48 AM)aadityap0901 Wrote: That feature is to reparse the include files after the Child IDE's work is done
Similar to change a character to update the IDE Syntax...

I get that but why cant i have both open indepently!? Being forced to close the child to once again work on the Main is annoying as i may again have to work on the child!

Thanks

John
Reply
#4
Why not work in 2 different windows? 

"Child IDE"??? sounds like OOPS
  724  855  599  923  575  468  400  206  147  564  878  823  652  556 bxor cross forever
Reply
#5
(11-05-2025, 04:10 AM)Unseen Machine Wrote:
(11-05-2025, 03:48 AM)I get that but why cant i have both open indepently!? Being forced to close the child to once again work on the Main is annoying as i may again have to work on the Wrote:
That works. Or do you mean something else?

[Image: IDE-Zwei-anzeigen.jpg]
Reply
#6
Just open the file in another window. Or in Notepad++.
The noticing will continue
Reply
#7
I agree with this post and its responses. A feature that isnt complete is basically a bug.
Reply
#8
But the "bug" is THE feature, use 2 windows and get the best of both worlds. Multitasking is less efficient.
  724  855  599  923  575  468  400  206  147  564  878  823  652  556 bxor cross forever
Reply
#9
(11-06-2025, 03:01 AM)bplus Wrote: But the "bug" is THE feature, use 2 windows and get the best of both worlds. Multitasking is less efficient.
oh blpus you're all over the place

But the "bug" is THE feature = typical phoenix edition attitude regardless of who when or what it is
best of both worlds = if we are in the best world already then why doesnt everyone use the "feature" happily?
Multitasking is less efficient = speak your truth boyo but i dont know who will agree

Point stands. That behavior is wak.
Reply
#10
I am not all over the place I am sticking to 2 windows, one for editing each file. The bug is a feature because you will see that a 2 window system is the way to go, no fuss no muss and be happy to use it after heavy edits of library files. The "feature" is good only for peeking to see library code.

"Point stands. That behavior is wak."
Yes I suppose in your lord it over everyone else viewpoint I can see you thinking that.

"Multitasking is less efficient = speak your truth boyo but i dont know who will agree"
Quote:Multitasking is less efficient because it is actually rapid "task switching," which creates a cognitive cost of regaining focus for each switch, leading to decreased productivity and quality. This constant switching can increase stress, lead to more errors, and mentally fatigue the brain, even though it feels like you're accomplishing more. True multitasking is only possible for highly practiced tasks that do not conflict with each other, such as walking on a treadmill while listening to a podcast.
How multitasking hurts efficiency
It's actually task switching: When you "multitask," you are rapidly switching your attention between different tasks instead of doing them simultaneously. This switching has a mental cost.
Increased errors: Constantly shifting focus can lead to lower quality work and more mistakes, as it is harder to maintain the necessary concentration for each task.
Cognitive fatigue: The constant need to re-orient your brain to a new task is mentally exhausting, depleting your cognitive resources and making it harder to focus in the long run.
Stress and reduced performance: Studies show that multitasking can increase stress levels, and the feeling of being overwhelmed can negatively impact performance.
What to do instead
Prioritize and focus: Dedicate uninterrupted blocks of time to a single, important task. This is known as "monotasking".
Eliminate distractions: Minimize interruptions like phone notifications or unnecessary browser tabs to help your brain stay focused on the current task.
Take breaks: Regular breaks can actually help you maintain focus and productivity over a sustained period.
Group similar tasks: Use techniques like time-blocking to handle similar tasks at the same time, such as responding to emails during specific blocks rather than throughout the day.
Mindful work: Practice mindful work habits to intentionally narrow your focus to one thing at a time, improving concentration and overall well-being.
Why multitasking makes you less productive - Fast Company
Dec 11, 2023 — Doing multiple activities at the same time is actually “task switching.” This is incredibly inefficient for the brain ...

Fast Company

Why Multitasking Doesn’t Work and Is Actually Making Your Life Worse
Aug 19, 2024 — Wagner says. If your head's down writing a report, then you pick up your phone and send a text, then return to the rep...

SELF Magazine

Multitasking and How It Affects Your Brain Health
Jan 25, 2023 — How can you minimize the effects of multitasking? The only time you can truly multitask is if one of the tasks is full...

Brown University Health

Show all
Dive deeper in AI Mode



Multitasking: Switching costs

American Psychological Association (APA)
https://www.apa.org › topics › research › multitasking
Thus, multitasking may seem efficient on the surface but may actually take more time in the end and involve more error.

Well know flaw surprised you are unaware maybe too much Discording.
  724  855  599  923  575  468  400  206  147  564  878  823  652  556 bxor cross forever
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)