Yeah. It compiles just fine because of all the changes we have made to QB64-PE codebase (you can see these in the git commits). However, as you discovered, there are still some issues. We'll need to get these issues fixed if we ever want to make the switch.
|
niXman gcc-13.1.0
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
niXman gcc-13.1.0 - by Jack - 06-02-2023, 10:14 AM
RE: niXman gcc-13.1.0 - by Kernelpanic - 06-02-2023, 02:11 PM
RE: niXman gcc-13.1.0 - by a740g - 06-02-2023, 04:33 PM
RE: niXman gcc-13.1.0 - by Jack - 06-02-2023, 05:17 PM
RE: niXman gcc-13.1.0 - by Jack - 06-02-2023, 05:55 PM
RE: niXman gcc-13.1.0 - by a740g - 06-03-2023, 01:33 AM
RE: niXman gcc-13.1.0 - by Jack - 10-03-2023, 02:42 PM
RE: niXman gcc-13.1.0 - by JRace - 10-04-2023, 02:18 AM
RE: niXman gcc-13.1.0 - by a740g - 10-04-2023, 12:51 PM
|
| Possibly Related Threads… | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| Comparison QB64 compiled with gcc optimizations and without | Coolman | 77 | 17,334 |
09-20-2022, 05:01 PM Last Post: Coolman |
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)