Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
REDIM takes more resources than DIM?
#33
I can't see any inconsistency, but that may be because I've never been as involved with Basic as most people here.

I looked at the description of Dim and ReDim in the manual again... the developers of Quick Basic knew exactly what they were doing. That's my impression anyway. I don't think they saw any inconsistency in their work. For them, it was obviously the only right way. But you should also take into account the time and the hardware available.

One should leave it as it is. Who knows what will happen if one change it.

The current behavior is well described and it works. What more could you want?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
REDIM takes more resources than DIM? - by bplus - 07-17-2024, 12:21 AM
RE: REDIM takes more resources than DIM? - by Kernelpanic - 07-22-2024, 08:30 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Preserving multi-dim arrays Pete 5 416 12-19-2025, 03:17 PM
Last Post: Dimster
  packaging resources tool TempodiBasic 6 583 09-22-2025, 11:16 PM
Last Post: TempodiBasic
  DIM AT -- feature request Jack 2 714 08-15-2023, 12:15 AM
Last Post: grymmjack
  REDIM, TYPE, and STRING Woes TerryRitchie 16 3,160 04-13-2023, 05:17 AM
Last Post: DSMan195276
  suggestion: initialize array values within the DIM statement bobalooie 19 3,358 12-22-2022, 06:46 PM
Last Post: Kernelpanic

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)