Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
You never CALL
#13
A bit later someone will arrive whose first post on the forum involves a surprising amount of parenthesis on what is supposed to be only one parameter to pass to a subprogram. "CALL" only adds to that confusion -- to use it or not to use it? But M$QB allowed the parenthesis, what's up with QB64(PE) now, isn't it supposed to be compatible? Sigh...

The title of the topic should be : "YOU NEVER CALLS", because that other one is pretty much non-existent. Hooray for QB64(PE) able to inject C/C++ code through "dot-h" files.

One more thing. I don't like the hating on "LET". It's not needed but it's better not to discuss it because it encourages even more speculation about what BASIC dialect might be better than another.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
You never CALL - by Pete - 12-01-2022, 04:37 PM
RE: You never CALL - by bplus - 12-01-2022, 05:05 PM
RE: You never CALL - by Pete - 12-01-2022, 05:18 PM
RE: You never CALL - by bplus - 12-01-2022, 05:22 PM
RE: You never CALL - by CharlieJV - 12-01-2022, 05:58 PM
RE: You never CALL - by James D Jarvis - 12-01-2022, 07:54 PM
RE: You never CALL - by CharlieJV - 12-01-2022, 08:03 PM
RE: You never CALL - by Pete - 12-01-2022, 08:53 PM
RE: You never CALL - by James D Jarvis - 12-01-2022, 09:11 PM
RE: You never CALL - by Pete - 12-01-2022, 09:53 PM
RE: You never CALL - by Kernelpanic - 12-01-2022, 11:16 PM
RE: You never CALL - by mnrvovrfc - 12-02-2022, 12:23 AM
RE: You never CALL - by Pete - 12-01-2022, 11:24 PM
RE: You never CALL - by mnrvovrfc - 12-02-2022, 12:15 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)